Creative Fields, Architecture & Design — what the record shows
6 coded decisions · read for the reasons cases fail, not to score you
Fewer than 20 coded cases at this depth — figures shown are for Educators.
How cases like this are judged
These figures are for the Educators profile — too few cases at this depth for its own. Of the 114 decisions there that reached the merits, here is where each Dhanasar prong was found not established. 57 more never reached the merits and are not counted below.
Prong 1 — national importancenot established in 102 of 111 (92%)
98 of those were the deciding prong.
Prong 2 — well positionednot established in 9 of 15 (60%)
8 of those were the deciding prong.
Prong 3 — balance of factorsnot established in 10 of 11 (91%)
7 of those were the deciding prong.
Where cases like this most often fail
What this profile cannot afford to skip
- ✓Impact must reach beyond a particular geographic area or set of clients. The Policy Manual requires that the benefit be national in scope, not confined to a local or regional area.
- ✓The relevant question is not the importance of the industry or profession in which the individual will work. The endeavor itself must have substantial merit and national importance, distinct from the field's general value.
- ✓The proposed endeavor must be specific, and it must stay the same endeavor: material changes after filing are not considered. Define it before you file, not on appeal.
The appeal outcomes behind these numbers
Shareable finding
Creative Fields, Architecture & Design: local, not national scope in 68% of failures
171 coded decisions, 2016-2026 · local, not national scope in 76 · denial reversed in 1
Adjacent profiles
6coded decisions sit under this profile. A placement shows where yours would sit among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Statistics from the coded record (2016–2026). Methodology