NIW Bearings
dismissedSEP192025_05B52032025-09-19 · appeal

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The petitioner, an associate professor of human resources, initially proposed a comparative study of migrant workers' reactions to deceptive recruitment practices, then substituted a different study on workplace substance abuse and school violence in his RFE response.

Field: human resources / people analytics · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“we conclude that he made a material change to the petition and to his eligibility claims”

AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Material change of endeavor · p1 — the endeavor described on appeal is not the one filed
89coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →

Notable

Petitioner materially changed the described research endeavor between filing and the RFE response, which the AAO treated as an independent, alternative basis for denial alongside a national-importance shortfall.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • Matter of Izummi
  • Matter of Katigbak
  • Matter of Y-B-

Cases in adjacent profiles