NIW Bearings
dismissedSEP182025_03B52032025-09-18 · combined

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The petitioner proposed an IT solutions endeavor; this motion claimed ineffective assistance by an individual who allegedly misrepresented herself as his attorney and altered his business plan after filing.

Field: software solutions / IT · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“claims regarding economic impact and job creation, were unsupported by the record”

AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
2,589coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →

Notable

Petitioner claimed ineffective assistance by an individual who misrepresented herself as an attorney and allegedly caused a material change to his business plan, but the record showed he was the sole signatory with no attorney of record, and he did not comply with Matter of Lozada; AAO also reaffirmed that his prior economic-impact claims for his IT solutions business were unsupported.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • Matter of Coelho
  • Matter of Izummi
  • Matter of O-S-G-

Cases in adjacent profiles