The Petitioner, a health promoter, proposed to continue designing, implementing, and managing health promotion and chronic-disease reduction programs in Florida and New York, targeting rural and underserved communities.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“The Petitioner has not identified any particular underserved or rural community where she intends to work.”

“The Petitioner's arguments center on the effects of a healthier population, generally, rather than focusing on the outcomes experienced by individuals who will be impacted by her specific endeavor.”

“The Petitioner does not claim any direct economic impacts of her proposed endeavor, either through the creation of additional jobs or the generation of significant income for her organization.”

“The Petitioner has not established her proposed endeavor sufficiently extends beyond her organization and its clientele to impact the industry or the field more broadly, at a level commensurate with national importance.”

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

• other · discounted

  “the Petitioner must establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor rather than the importance of health promotion and healthy living generally”

  AAO decision text
• recommendation letter · ignored

Where this case turned

• Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
• Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
• Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
• Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region

Notable

AAO noted the Petitioner cited a since-rescinded executive order on racial equity/underserved communities and stated it would consider the national-importance claim 'without considering it the subject of a national initiative' given the rescission (footnote 2).

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

• 8 C.F.R. 103.3
• Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles

• The Petitioner, an aircraft mechanic and instructor, proposed to enhance aviation maintenance training programs, support
• The Petitioner seeks EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree with a national inter
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver of the job offer requirement, but the substance of the proposed e
• The Beneficiary, sponsored by a private airline, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability in a
• The petitioner sought an EB-2 national interest waiver as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; the sp