NIW Bearings
remandedJAN122026_01B52032026-01-12 · appeal · SCOPS Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, an accountant with a degree in public accounting, proposed to provide consulting, training, and professional services in financial control, bookkeeping, and tax compliance to small businesses, startups, and entrepreneurs.

Field: accounting, financial consulting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • degree · credited

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The remand was granted solely because SCOPS adjudicated the wrong endeavor entirely — analyzing the petition as if the Petitioner were an electrical engineer seeking to research power systems, when she is actually an accountant proposing financial consulting services. The AAO nonetheless observed that the Petitioner's actual endeavor does not appear to meet the Dhanasar three-prong framework, signaling skepticism about the petition's ultimate merits even after a proper analysis. No prong-level failure codes were assigned because the AAO made no substantive findings on the correct endeavor.

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

SCOPS analyzed the wrong endeavor (electrical engineering research) instead of Petitioner's actual endeavor (financial consulting services), rendering the denial procedurally defective and requiring remand.

Transferable lesson

Ensure the adjudicator's decision addresses the endeavor as actually stated in the record; a mismatched analysis is remandable regardless of underlying merits.

Endeavor framing

vague

National-importance theory

economic_growth_generic

Evidence targeting

person_focused

Cases in adjacent profiles