NIW Bearings
dismissedFEB272025_02B52032025-02-27 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, an airline pilot, proposed to work as a Line Captain and instructor, aiming to harmonize technical and administrative aspects of aviation and bridge flight crew and management perspectives.

Field: aviation / airline piloting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

The Director found the Petitioner did not qualify as an advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability, but the AAO reserved this issue and did not reach it since the NIW prong 1 failure was dispositive.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“The Petitioner has not demonstrated, however, that these revenue and tax projections are significantly high for the airline industry or otherwise indicate positive economic effects commensurate with national importance.”
“The Petitioner has not established how, as an airline pilot, he would be responsible for employing crew members rather than the airlines for which he works.”
“T-S- does not articulate how the Petitioner's work in these areas would extend beyond the airlines he would work for, his passengers and his trainees.”
“Our assessment of national importance does not focus on the importance of a field or industry in general, but instead "focuses on the specific endeavor that the foreign national proposes to undertake."”
“T-S- also claims the Petitioner's proposed endeavor will have a significant and positive impact on the U.S. economy by addressing the pilot shortage, offering training programs, engaging in ferry flight operations, embracing innovation and technology, and streamlining operations.”
“S-Q- does not explain, however, how the Petitioner's work as a pilot would extend beyond the airlines, passengers, and trainees he would work with to impact his field more broadly.”

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    “does not explain how the Petitioner's work in these areas would extend beyond the airlines or companies he would work for and his trainees”
    AAO decision text
  • contract revenue · discounted
    “has not demonstrated, however, that these revenue and tax projections are significantly high for the airline industry”
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    “The reports and articles do not discuss the Petitioner's proposed endeavor and are not probative of whether his proposed endeavor has national importance.”
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Employer-specific benefit · p1 — "work furthers my company's product" — value accrues to one firm
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
  • Letters conclusory · p1 — letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
  • Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
  • Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1 — argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →

Notable

The AAO reserved the threshold EB-2 exceptional ability determination entirely, resolving the case solely on Dhanasar prong 1 (national importance), and dismissed multiple economic-impact arguments (ticket revenue, tax revenue, cargo tonnage, job creation for crew) as not shown to be significantly high or attributable to the petitioner rather than his employer airlines.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • Flores v. Garland
  • Matter of L-A-C-

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

He claimed the airline's ticket revenue, taxes, and crew jobs as his endeavor's economic effects; AAO held those belong to the airlines that employ him, and his safety and training work stayed bounded to employers and trainees.

Transferable lesson

You cannot claim your employer's revenue, taxes, or workforce as your endeavor's economic effect; the impact counted is what is attributable to your individual work beyond the companies you serve.

Endeavor framing

moderate

National-importance theory

economic_growth_generic · economic_job_creation · field_advancement

Evidence targeting

person_focused

Cases in adjacent profiles

← Back to the case explorer