This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner seeks to advance data-driven automation technologies enabling real-time capacity planning and labor optimization at scale, with the goal of strengthening the U.S. supply chain and enhancing operational resilience for American businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises.
Field: supply chain management / data-driven automation · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
How the evidence was treated
- other · discounted
“SCOPS generally listed some of the evidence submitted by the Petitioner, SCOPS did not include an analysis of the evidence and an explanation of its deficiency.”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
Remand was granted entirely on procedural/adjudicative error grounds: SCOPS named a different individual throughout the denial, misidentified the Petitioner's degree (computer science instead of supply management), misidentified the proposed endeavor (software developer for a named company instead of supply chain automation), and failed to substantively analyze any of the three Dhanasar prongs or the evidence in the record. The AAO expressly declined to reach the merits and expressed no opinion on ultimate resolution. The decision also contains a gender inconsistency — the Petitioner is referred to as 'she' throughout but the final paragraph uses 'he.'
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
SCOPS's denial referenced a different individual, misidentified the proposed endeavor as software development, and listed evidence without analysis; AAO held these errors required remand.
If the denial describes the wrong endeavor or a different person, or lists evidence without analyzing it, those errors are grounds for remand; raise them specifically on appeal.
moderate
us_competitiveness · economic_growth_generic
mixed
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
- The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
- The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
- The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
- The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod