This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a senior systems capability engineer, proposes to continue developing advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and automated driving systems (ADS), with a specific focus on speed modification and control systems enabling safe automatic braking and acceleration for vehicles in real-world road conditions.
Field: mechanical engineering / driving automation technologies (ADAS/ADS) · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the Petitioner has not demonstrated that his undertaking has implications beyond his employer and its clients to impact the U.S. economy or the transportation field as a whole”
“Benefits to a specific employer alone, even an employer with a national footprint, are not sufficiently relevant to the question of whether a person's endeavor has national importance.”
“alignment with general national goals, in and of itself, does not necessarily establish that the Petitioner's endeavor rises to the level of national importance.”
“the relevant question is not the importance of the industry or profession in which the individual will work. Instead, we focus on 'the specific endeavor that the foreign national proposes to undertake.'”
“the Petitioner has not demonstrated that his proposed endeavor extends beyond his routine employment duties or that it is independent of objectives.”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“they do not offer sufficient, detailed, and concrete examples of how the Petitioner's endeavor has the potential for broad and measurable implications for the country beyond impacting his employer and its clients.”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“the authors do not sufficiently explain how the Petitioner's specific projects stand to have an impact that extends beyond the company and its clients to influence the Petitioner's field of endeavor.”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“their overall significance does not establish the national importance of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor in particular.”
AAO decision text - resume experience · discounted
“The Petitioner's professional experiences are generally material to Dhanasar's second prong...but they are generally immaterial to the first Dhanasar prong.”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“the record does not include adequate corroborating evidence, to show that the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor offers broader implications in his field”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Employer-specific benefit · p1 — "work furthers my company's product" — value accrues to one firm
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
Notable
SCOPS had already conceded prongs 1 (substantial merit) and 2 (well-positioned), finding only national importance under prong 1 and prong 3 lacking; the AAO on appeal agreed national importance was not established and declined to reach prong 3. The AAO also noted the Petitioner failed to clearly explain how his endeavor is meaningfully distinct from or independent of his employer's proprietary objectives, raising an employer-capture concern under prong 1.
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
Petitioner failed to show his specific endeavor's impact extended beyond his employer and its customers to a national or field-wide scale, rather than merely reflecting industry importance.
Distinguish the specific endeavor from routine employer duties and provide concrete, measurable evidence of impact beyond the employer to establish national importance.
moderate
critical_emerging_tech · public_health · field_advancement · economic_growth_generic
person_focused
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
- The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
- The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
- The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
- The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod