This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a physician specializing in urologic oncology, proposed to provide clinical care to cancer patients while conducting research and leading clinical trials to develop innovative surgical approaches enhancing cancer care delivery.
Field: urologic oncology · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
Director had already concluded Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; not disputed on appeal.
Prong 1 — national importanceestablished
Prong 2 — well positionedestablished
Prong 3 — balance of factorsestablished
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · credited
- citations publications · credited
- resume experience · credited
- degree · credited
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
AAO reversed the Director's denial on all three prongs, finding the Director erred in concluding prongs two and three were not satisfied; case involved a physician-researcher whose clinical/research hybrid endeavor was found to meet all Dhanasar prongs, including reliance on a CDC fellow's letter explaining unsuitability of labor certification for highly skilled researchers.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- Poursina v. USCIS
- USCIS Policy Manual F.5(D)(2)
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
AAO found nationwide adoption of Petitioner's surgical techniques, authorship of AUA CME materials, and expert letters (including CDC fellow) establishing broad significance satisfied all three Dhanasar prongs, reversing Director's prong 2 and 3 findings.
Support prongs 2-3 with concrete evidence of nationwide use/adoption of the petitioner's specific contributions (e.g., required exams, guidelines) rather than generic credentials alone.
moderate
public_health · economic_job_creation · field_advancement
mixed
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a pharmacist, proposed to work in the United States through her own company providing pharmaceutical reg
- The Petitioner, a Brazilian-trained physiotherapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist and entrepreneur in the Un
- The Petitioner, a resident physician in New York holding a Chinese bachelor of medicine (MBBS) degree found equivalent t
- The Petitioner, a music therapist, proposed to establish and expand music therapy services and community music programs
- The Petitioner, a physical therapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist in the United States while operating his